Key Question
Some certainly do, but for example in 2010 Arthur Brouhard Robinson asked around in the United States and found 31,487 American scientists including 9,029 with PhDs who agreed to this petition.

The media spreads the claim that there is a “consensus” of 97% of scientists and academic institutions as “proof” that “the science is settled’. You may want to read for yourself the claimed “consensus” studies methodology it does little to hide it motivated reasoning. Friends of Science in 2014 compiled a report 97% CONSENSUS? NO! GLOBAL WARMING MATH MYTHS & SOCIAL PROOFS which helps untangle the web and why there is in fact no consensus on human-caused global warming as claimed in these studies.
Science is not a democracy. Israeli‐American physics professor at the Racah Institute of Physics of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Dr. Nir Shaviv can explain more how science is about evidence and not consensus.
So, what do the “97% consensus” scientists generally agree on?
Climate change isn't a new phenomenon driven only by carbon dioxide from human industrial emissions and activities but climate has always typically changed in cycles. Natural forces of climate change are chaotic and have complex dynamic interplay.
Dr. John Harper discusses various natural climate change factors in this series of short videos.

Supporting those who are actively involved in pragmatic solutions is crucial, as it bolsters their efforts, amplifies their message, and fosters a stronger, more effective community driving towards meaningful change.
Find inquirers worth supporting.
Staying informed on important topics, such as climate change, enhances our understanding of the world. This empowers us to engage in meaningful conversations and equips us to make informed decisions that can lead to positive change.
Maybe we can help.
Asking questions unlocks a powerful curiosity, helping everyone gain clarity.
Engage with some fellow inquirers.
It's vital we ensure that good people are not silenced, as their voices often bring necessary change, different and ethical perspectives and positive influences that are essential for a just and prosperous society.
Help us hold the line.
Have a different question and can’t find the answer you’re looking for? Reach out to us by sending us an email and we’ll get back to you as soon as we can.
Given the uncertainty of climate science and the unsoundest of proposed migrations, it our responsibility to demand accountability.
Learn moreUnlikely, Carbon dioxide is plant food. Calling it 'carbon pollution' is political and not scientifically based.
Learn moreMaybe, for although modernity isn't historical the recent climate changes do fall within natural variability.
Learn moreNo, the costs would be trillions of dollars for Canada to impose current proposals with a possible net-negative environmental effect.
Learn moreNot accurately, models make assumptions about a complex system so their forecasts remain unreliable at this time.
Learn more