Key Question
Given the uncertainty about future climate states and the degree to which humanity’s greenhouse gas emissions are having an impact, there are three sensible responses to the public’s concerns about climate change in our view:

Human societies have always suffered due to climate variability and violent weather. This is because climate change and extreme weather happen continuously on planets with dynamic atmospheres such as the Earth. Natural variations in our planet’s ‘average temperature’ have ranged over a span of almost 35 degrees Celsius over the ages. It is clearly a mistake to think that Earthly climate was stagnant until we started burning fossil fuels.
Consequently, preparing society for these inevitable events is one of the most critical functions of government. Societies that did not sensibly prepare for climate changes and extreme weather are long gone. For example, the Greenland Viking colonies were established during the Medieval Warm Period (1100 – 1300 AD) but collapsed when they failed to adapt to the extreme cold of the Little Ice Age. Even today, indigenous populations in the far north and the Sahel region of Africa must prepare for natural climate change, or die.
India has demonstrated sensible measures in this regard. They have built multi-story storm shelters designed to house hundreds of people for days at a time above the waves. These are situated at one-kilometer intervals all along the coast of the Bay of Bengal, where most of their tropical cyclones occur. Citizen need walk only a half-kilometer or less to be safe when cyclones hit.
In the industrialized world, we need to harden our societies to withstand extreme events of all kinds, independent of causes. Sensible adaptation measures would include reinforcing buildings, burying cables underground and strengthening public infrastructure by building levees and upgrading our irrigation systems where needed. We also need to relocate populations living on flood plains or at extreme risk from tornadoes and hurricanes.
Only wealthy societies have the resources to properly prepare for extreme events. Similarly, only prosperous nations care about environmental protection. Climate Change Reconsidered II: Fossil Fuels (CCRII: Fossil Fuels), a 780-page report issued last year by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) put it well:
“Prosperity leads to environmental protection becoming a higher social value and provides the resources needed to make it possible.”
The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) diagram, shown below (extracted from CCRII: Fossil Fuels), shows that, as development begins, environmental degradation increases until a per-capita income tipping point is reached, after which the environment begins to improve.

Proper environmental stewardship would include reducing land, air and water pollution to levels at which the harm they cause is considered acceptable. It would also include protecting species at risk (the polar bear is not one of them) and conserving natural resources for future human use, both as consumables and for recreation.
See another realistic approach to climate change by The Heartland Institute
Supporting those who are actively involved in pragmatic solutions is crucial, as it bolsters their efforts, amplifies their message, and fosters a stronger, more effective community driving towards meaningful change.
Find inquirers worth supporting.
Staying informed on important topics, such as climate change, enhances our understanding of the world. This empowers us to engage in meaningful conversations and equips us to make informed decisions that can lead to positive change.
Maybe we can help.
Asking questions unlocks a powerful curiosity, helping everyone gain clarity.
Engage with some fellow inquirers.
It's vital we ensure that good people are not silenced, as their voices often bring necessary change, different and ethical perspectives and positive influences that are essential for a just and prosperous society.
Help us hold the line.
Have a different question and can’t find the answer you’re looking for? Reach out to us by sending us an email and we’ll get back to you as soon as we can.
Some certainly do, but there remains a wide range of scientific opinion about the causes and consequences of climate change.
Learn moreMaybe, for although modernity isn't historical the recent climate changes do fall within natural variability.
Learn moreNot accurately, models make assumptions about a complex system so their forecasts remain unreliable at this time.
Learn moreNo, the costs would be trillions of dollars for Canada to impose current proposals with a possible net-negative environmental effect.
Learn moreUnlikely, Carbon dioxide is plant food. Calling it 'carbon pollution' is political and not scientifically based.
Learn more